On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:46:33AM (+0100), Johann Felix Soden wrote: > Hi Sebastien, hi Tomasz, > > I have not yet completely reviewed hwinfo 21.0-1, but > there is at least one thing which needs to be fixed:
Hi Johann, Thanks for your time and this review! > - debian/libhd21.symbols is incomplete on i386. A fixed version is > attached. > > And I found trailing whitespaces in old debian/changelog entries and > debian/libhd-doc.doc-base. The master branch is up-to-date according your comments, thanks ! > Since related, here some comments about libx86emu: > > At the moment, it FTBFS on some architectures [mips, mipsel, > powerpc, ...] because of missing sys/io.h. > As the new hwinfo depends on it, this restricts the architectures where > it will be available. So this should be fixed before hwinfo is uploaded > - for example by fixing libx86emu itself or by reducing the dependency > to the architectures where it is really available. Hum, and it's not a missing dependency to libc6-dev ? (I'm maybe wrong) > Actually, the libx86 package contains a copy of libx86emu > and has therefore similar problems [1,2]. Please contact Anibal Monsalve > Salazar (ani...@debian.org) who maintains it. Especially for the > security team, it would be nice, if it could use the new libx86emu > package instead of including its own copy. Contacted :-) Thanks a lot, Seb -- Sebastien Badia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
