On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Paul Wise escribió: > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 01:44 +0100, Sebastien Badia wrote: > > > Therefore we do anything with this package? RoQA anyway? > > Thanks for the explanation, it sounds like this package should remain in > Debian instead of being removed, good luck with finding a sponsor.
Hi Pabs, I will do it. Sebastien, some comments. Your package seems to be fine, good job, but some changes are welcome. In the debian/changelog file, you included that this new version fixes all lintian warnings and errors. Please, include the lintian problems that your changes solve (quilt-patch-missing-description, out-of-date-standards-version, spelling-error-in-manpage,...). These changes are related with these comments: - The description in the debian/control file was updated, you should include it in the changelog file. - The debian/copyright file was updated, you should include it in the changelog file. - The files debian/patches/02_typo_fix.patch and debian/patches/06_asused_pod.patch were modified. You should include these changes in the changelog file (DEP-3, whitespaces, typos,...). The Subject line for patch 02 should change too, because now are three typos, no only one. You can change the file name if you want. I will upload the package after these changes. Thanks a lot, Best regards, kix -- .''`. Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) <k...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 3F48 0B8C C385 AD41 9E28 006A 7B1F 5490 72B7 4923 `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
