Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#727708: call for votes on default Linux init system
for jessie"):
> Bdale Garbee writes ("call for votes on default Linux init system for
> jessie"):
> > The default init system for Linux architectures in jessie should be
> >
> > D. systemd
> >
> > U. upstart
> >
> > R. openrc
> >
> > V. sysvinit (no change)
> >
> > F. requires further discussion.
I have lettered these.
> So that leaves my text from yesterday:
>
> M. Debian intends to support multiple init systems, for the
> foreseeable future, and so long as their respective communities
> and code remain healthy. Software outside of an init system's
> implementation may not require a specific init system to be
> pid 1, although degraded operation is tolerable.
(I forgot to say, I edited that a bit.)
> vs something like:
>
> O. Debian intends to converge on one init system; in jessie+1,
> packages may require that the default init system is in use.
If we are I to vote now, I would like to see on the ballot at least:
DM systemd by default, but also others
DO systemd only in jessie+1
UM upstart by default, but also others
UO upstart only in jessie+1
RM openrc by default, but also others
VM sysvinit by default, but also others
I don't think RO and VO make much sense.
Does my text for "O" correctly represent the views of those who want
us to converge on a single system ?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
