On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:38:24PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>, 2014-01-21, 21:23: > >>>| 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80] > >>>Oops. > >> > >>that could be a problem in ci.d.n, which is pretty new - > >>currently half the autotests there fail, while the packages are > >>not *that* broken :) > >> > >>cc:ing terceiro so he can comment on this. > > > >interesting ... to me it looks like the mirror was inconsistent > >(i.e. version 0.11.3 was in the indexes but its files were not in > >the pool yet). > > > >I've added to my TODO list to look into this issue. > > I uploaded a new version in the mean time, and now I get something > completely different[0]: > > | adequate SKIP Test breaks testbed but testbed does not > advertise revert-full-system > | adt-run: @@@@@@@@@@ run_tests ... > | * SKIP package has metadata but no tests > | adt-run: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ tests done. > | > | =============================================== > | Status: fail (Tests failed); duration: 0h 0m 3s > | =============================================== > > I find the “package has metadata but no tests” confusing. The > package certainly has tests, it's just (if I understand correctly) > adt-run can't run any of them in the current setup.
please report a bug against autopkgtest for this bit. > Also, I'm not sure if “fail” is the correct status in this case. sure. it's in the debci TODO list to differentiate between all possible non-zero exit codes of adt-run. -- Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
