* Emmanuel Bourg: > Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package instead? > japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%. Here are the issues > found by clirr: > > ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer > removed > [...]
To me, this looks like a significant, backward-incompatible changes in the API. In the world of shared libraries, this kind of stuff makes changes to the SONAME necessary. That being said, it might be possible to package a newer version of icu4j instead (I haven't tried building Lucene4 against anything newer than 49.1.) Upstream is at 52.1 right now. Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
