On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > But > it was way behind both systemd and upstart in terms of readiness in Debian > going into this discussion, and the amount of catching up that's required > here for it to displace upstart as my second choice just doesn't seem > feasible for me.
Shouldn't this be seen as reason to slow things down? Using a bureaucratic quality like "readiness" to make a technical decision seems like a contradiction. Anyway, why is there so much rush? jessie is going to default to sysvinit no matter what. Why not let the project evolve its own solution in the meantime? The TC could help that along more so by giving the project some guidelines to best avoid obstructing each others init system work. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
