On 17 January 2014 17:59, Neutron Soutmun <neo.neut...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have no right to upload, but I'm interested in "nftables" also. > therefore, I have both dget and git clone your source package for > testing and reviewing. > > Below is my review. >
Thanks you for the review! Some comments below. > * debian/control: > + could bump the standards-version to 3.9.5 as lintian has warned right now. > (found a revert commit in git :P) Fixed, but for the next version of the package. > + cosmetic, please apply wrap-and-sort -sa > I don't like it. If not required, I would leave this as is. > * debian/copyright: > + forgot the debian/* license isn't needed, since 3.9.3. > + the upstream license could be GPL-2+ as mention in the COPYING file fixed, for the next version of the package. > > * debian/watch: > + I know you plan the watch file for the upstream first release but > it could be changed later, for my suggestion is > > === 8< === > opts=uversionmangle=s/^/0.0.0~/ \ > > http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/libnftables/snapshot/libnftables-(\d\S*).tar.bz2 > === 8< === > > just track the snapshot tarball, I know it's nonsense but it's not > broken watch file :) > Changing this will require another change in a [near] future. I don't see the point. > * vcs-git: > + cloned, the "git buildpackage -S" is failed. the upstream tag > << upstream/0.0.0_20131209 >> is missing. > I added the tag :) > Hopefully, the package will be sponsored soon. Good luck. > Again, thanks! -- Arturo Borrero González -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org