-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Please keep the bug on CC:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:09:39PM +0100, Gabriele Pulzato wrote: > we just found out session-child.c of lightdm-1.2.2, at row #291 use > pam_chauthtok (pam_handle, 0). > Gdm3 use pam_chauthtok (worker->priv->pam_handle, PAM_CHANGE_EXPIRED_AUTHTOK). > Should lightdm use PAM_CHANGE_EXPIRED_AUTHTOK flag too? We tried to > recompile lightdm with this change and it all works perfectly. According to http://linux.die.net/man/3/pam_chauthtok, not passing PAM_CHANGE_EXPIRED_AUTHTOK flag just means that all authentications tokens should be changed, so I'm unsure how it's supposed to fix the problem. In any case, I'll ask upstream about that. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis Perez -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS2SBdAAoJEG3bU/KmdcClHAQH/RH+jI0A1quuSxx4moOXU3hV IYcfi+fh396phjouU02bJRXwPl9WephXFgdMEu2Uq4PFZio5sOxXx/x+Uc0S+6pE 3f7NuZnSRYRSEqokRYeR5Yo2wjfGV+b2y62jMniwOf505JsMTk4Tr6K8XVsjB4kc 0Bpone/U599zWFGZJmfnsdn3r1kFIXiu1O5OPSCNamZtZUouOj5n6fxjemlV5Hhd oqYDAzLR5e51LN9jsNhd9KYkj0H8pxsbUQ0SwS3y50QOSBCuwB9ZwK4HjSmXfdE6 w5H+7Ij8qTa5iHf9vUBOsWIRLLIeatSxQ0UIgpN77i3+xIAIGTXgK7k0X6w2oK4= =UBuw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org