On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > El dc 15 de 01 de 2014 a les 08:33 -0800, Don Armstrong va escriure: > > We don't publish them in order to protect the reputation of people who > > are banned. The individuals who are banned can publish their ban if they > > wish. [I suppose we could also send ban messages to -project on behalf > > of the banned individual if they requested it; that's basically what > > happened here.] > > In this case, the ban message has been sent to debian-project. I, the > banned one, request that the related debian-private messages are > disclosed as well. In this case, is there any reason to not publish > these debian-private messages?
The message sent to -private is (effectively) the same message sent to you, which is published here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/01/msg00051.html any messages sent in response to the -private message are subject to this GR, and will remain private until the process outlined there occurs: http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002 -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com After the first battle of Sto Lat, I formulated a policy which has stood me in good stead in other battles. It is this: if an enemy has an impregnable stronghold, see he stays there. -- Terry Pratchett _Jingo_ p265 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
