-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 07:16:33PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:10:27AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > Unfortunately, there's no central way to configure PAM modules only for > > > use > > > in login sessions. As with pam_selinux and pam_loginuid, the only way to > > > do > > > this is for each service to include the module directly in their own PAM > > > config. > > > > Cloning this bug and reassigning it to the usual suspects. > > > As said on IRC, it'd had been nice to actually receive that in my mail, > > instead of just the clone/reassign from owner@b.d.o but eh. > > > Notwithstanding the local fixes in the various packages, wouldn't it > > be possible to have a common file to be included for those “pure login”, > > the way we have common-*? > > > I'm not really knowledgeable about the whole PAM configuration in > > Debian, but if multiple modules are in the same situation, it might make > > sense. What do you think? > > In effect, this is bug #677288. It's certainly possible, but this isn't > something I expect to have time to work on any time soon.
Keep us updated then, because I guess updating things in each and every login-related pam config fille will not be really sustainable in the long term. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis Perez -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS1W0FAAoJEG3bU/KmdcClSeEH/RKAIKS+n0r5kx26+eMG5Kg5 GYx4MpXwM4/DHrkTTRqS2M4VlNfk6Z4QApJibDstjRtYgWEAm+u1XfrVe1aiYssG 6xiGeZPyye3WmQfQ6OLoh19IWn8+54O0RY2SD92g61XfQXd8o8DmQE0QIIevUQ5/ ThEjW3nmSdInxekdpHsbOPs2307dn0GSVmREffCmTzsbheXFzXgsp1h6yhZRSYj1 XnZdl9ofshbEfi1C89wvfVNUF95hHkPXqG++ertyWDOWeuu7rOfaynQ/cN5JGDuZ XiArtSGe6VWHUXLDJ0uVMTGwDMh4HJZczgNSxGpIR/LR/ZAcURPznb+ly/fvy3k= =dG56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
