On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:40:23PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > I've just uploaded perl_5.18.2-1 to experimental. Dominic is going to > > run a test rebuild of at least the perl related packages next, but we > > don't expect regressions. > > > > Affected packages that we know of are (hope I got this right) > > > > is_affected: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18/" > > bad: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18\.2/" > > good: ".depends ~ /perl \(<< 5\.18\.3/" > > > > which would currently yield > > > > nmu libpar-packer-perl_1.017-1 . ALL . -m 'rebuild for Perl 5.18.2' > > nmu libdevel-cover-perl_1.08-1 . ALL . -m 'rebuild for Perl 5.18.2' > > nmu libclass-xsaccessor-perl_1.19-1 . ALL . -m 'rebuild for Perl 5.18.2' > > nmu libcommon-sense-perl_3.72-2 . ALL . -m 'rebuild for Perl 5.18.2' > > > > Additionally, libmodule-corelist-perl will need a source upload > > to upgrade to at least 3.03. > > In addition to these, libperl-apireference-perl is another known > package which needs to be upgraded (bug #735053 filed). > > I have rebuilt all perl modules and found no other failures relating to > 5.18.2 (just lots of bugs still unfixed since the main 5.18 transition :( ).
The two sourceful uploads have now been made, so we are now ready to proceed; please let us know if it's okay to upload 5.18.2 to unstable. Thanks! Dominic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
