On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote:
> From the email [1] on the VLC list I had the impression that > libpostproc is broken. That is my understanding as well. That's why I wanted to hear from you XBMC needs libpostproc for. Did you notice any visual improvements from enabling the libpostproc filter in XBMC? > If it is working fine I don't see why it should be dropped and I'll > keep libpostproc support in XBMC, too. Well I kept it around to not break the compilation of existing programs. And that part seems to be ok-ish. > I have looked into the source more closely and it seems using a very > hidden setting > XBMC users can pass postproc filters to libpostproc thus I can't > replace it with vf_yadif. vf_yadif is certainly no drop-in replacement, as it has a totally different API. This replacement may require significant knowledge of the codebase. > So if libpostproc will stay with us could you please upload it to > wheezy-backports to let me upload xbmc, too? Is this really necessary? What's the problem with the libpostproc-dev package provided by libav 0.8 in stable? http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libpostproc-dev Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
