On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 03:34:03PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > > > I wouldn't bother trying to get those to stable if I didn't think > > > they were important. > > > > So can someone please do something about this request? > > Ping?
This bug is now almost open for 5 months. There are basicly 2 very easy changes: 1) Add enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 to Configure on *-amd64 This makes the nistp curves used in for instance ECDHE costant time. Being costant time is important for security since it avoid side channel timing attacks. Those allow you to recover the private key based on the timing of the response. 2) Enable assembler on arm. That is replace ${no_asm} with ${armv4_asm}. This improves the performace on arm. Both those changes have been very well tested and are in unstable and testing for almost 8 months. In the mean time there has been a new upstream release containing important bug fixes. You can argue about some of the changes upstream made in the stable branch, but they consider those changes to be impotant enough to put it in the stable branch. One of the changes is to stop putting a timestamp in server/client hello and instead put something random there like it's supposed to be, which breaks tlsdate. I would like to get a lot of those changes, in the order of 20 or 30 patches, in stable. But I would actually prefer to just get the new upstream version in stable instead. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org