On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:19:18 -0800 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:53:14PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > Meanwhile, we're at qemu 1.7, ceph is at 0.72, both in sid and > > wheezy-backports. > > It doesn't appear to be in wheezy-backports, and is still having troubles > migrating to jessie/testing: > Argh, my bad. I clearly had too many parallel browser windows open yesterday when researching this and not the wheezy-backport but the sid one for ceph. ^_^;; > rmadison ceph > ceph | 0.48-2 | jessie | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, > mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc ceph | 0.48-2 | sid | source > ceph | 0.72.2-1 | sid | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, > mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc > > grep-excuses ceph > ceph (0.48-2 to 0.72.2-1) > Maintainer: Ceph Maintainers > 7 days old (needed 5 days) > out of date on i386: ceph-fuse, ceph-fuse-dbg (from 0.48-2) > ... > out of date on ia64: ceph-fuse, ceph-fuse-dbg (from 0.48-2) (but > ia64 isn't keeping up, so nevermind) Updating ceph fixes old bugs: > #705262 Not considered > Depends: ceph google-perftools (not considered) > > > Doesn't really seem like it's ready yet... > Unfortunately, though nobody in their right mind would use ceph-fuse anyway. ^o^
Well, lets hope this gets resolved in time for jessie, would be a shame otherwise. Thanks, Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer ch...@gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications http://www.gol.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
