This seems to be a different link to the same discussion: http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Doxygen-1-8-4-uses-libclang-to-improve-parsing-td4032204.html
I can't speak to the question about failure to build from source, but Doxygen's call and called-by trees are unusable for my C++ projects because Doxygen does not handle overloading well. With libclang support there seems to be hope that the trees will be right, and I could then turn them on in the Doxygen output. On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 04.09.2013 01:47, schrieb Thomas E. Vaughan: > > Package: doxygen > > Version: 1.8.4-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > It seems that doxygen in unstable does not depend on > > libclang even though it is at least at version 1.8.4. It > > would be cool to try out the improved parsing available via > > clang. > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/29490 > > 404 > > > Could you compile in support for libclang? > > how well is this tested? how many packages will ftbfs in unstable? > > Matthias > > -- Thomas E. Vaughan
