Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#727708: init system discussion status"):
>> Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:>>> My inclination would be to give maintainers technical advice to accept >>> integrations with either existing synchronization protocols, but leave >>> it as technical advice rather than the binding part of the decision. >> I strongly agree. > OK, I would be quite happy to say that we would like each daemon package > to implement at least one non-forking startup protocol, but that we > won't force this on maintainers. > Would that suit you both ? I may have lost the thread here, but that doesn't sound quite right. Wouldn't we want to say that each daemon package should implement the native non-forking startup protocol for the default init system, and we would like the maintainer to merge patches for other startup protocols if active maintainers of other init systems ask for this? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
