On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 01:55:55PM -0600, Michael Lustfield wrote: > That's perhaps a large way to say yes? I was just trying to ask a simpler > question. *If* an admin needs this file because they are using the xlst > module, will *this* file be exactly what 99.99% of people need with zero > modifications required?
This file should cover all use cases that I can presently think of, because it implements the standard. Unless you really need to save a few bytes memory and storage OR need one of the other code points (some symbols can be encoded differently), I do not see why you would need to modify it. Kind regards, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
