tags 728023 + patch thanks On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:00:05PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > I'm writing to you as the maintainer of lockdev (liblockdev1). I've > opened this bug because your package either has a build-depends on > liblockdev1-dev or is building binary packages with a dependency on > liblockdev1. > […] > It would be greatly appreciated if you could disable/remove lockdev > support from your package and remove it from the source build-depends > and/or package depends as appropriate, replacing this with flock(2) > calls instead of dev_lock and dev_unlock.
The following patch disables lockdev support in libcec. By removing it from the build dependencies configure warns about it not being present, but it successfully builds with lockdev support disabled. Please could this be applied and uploaded? libcec is the last remaining user of lockdev in the archive (all other users fixed or have been uploaded today). I'll be opening a bug for removal shortly. Thanks, Roger diff -urN libcec-2.1.4.original/debian/control libcec-2.1.4/debian/control --- libcec-2.1.4.original/debian/control 2014-01-01 19:49:09.000000000 +0000 +++ libcec-2.1.4/debian/control 2014-01-03 16:50:55.551633710 +0000 @@ -5,8 +5,7 @@ Uploaders: Sjoerd Simons <sjo...@debian.org> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.1.3~), pkg-config, - libudev-dev [linux-any], - liblockdev1-dev | liblockdev-dev + libudev-dev [linux-any] Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Homepage: http://libcec.pulse-eight.com/ Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/libcec.git -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
