-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
Le 02/01/2014 16:47, Guillem Jover a écrit : > On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 15:59:19 -0400, David Prévot wrote: >> According to dpkg-maintscript-helper(1), prior-version is not mandatory, >> but it seems that this statement is wrong. > > The code is wrong, I'm fixing that for 1.17.6, patch will be included > in my next push. Thanks for your prompt reaction. >> Side notes: >> - it would be nice if the created symlink was related as expected in >> policy, but that part might have to be handled in debhelper if not by >> the maintainer itself. > > I don't quite understand what you mean here. Could you rephrase it > somehow? […] > Oh, perhaps with the comment above you mean that the symlinks are not > created as mandated by policy, as in when they should be relative or > absolute? Thanks for being able to read my mind and phrase it in an understandable way. > If that's the case, yeah that's a Debian specific policy > that should be encoded in debhelper, or taken care of by the > maintainer. Regards David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSxdIXAAoJEAWMHPlE9r082zgH+wW5C2iLy+TOPDSjFr8Gh9kn 2Cq+Rpa9juhF7bsoAqwhifXvXPxQkpCHv2kN1RBm8EyDn+OzRA4edgUIBF0pcXPz 7wHvTtC7z2ZWpoAEOrAqeLPtXuucNgQwEl2kAvRPCBed/jwhJJrEv0U9Hh34WngF +OY6ldIVjC+dY7pBYmw4rjbYBvU11uD/vt3fHbgOQjtO0FuGOfoSl0ydWecMJajZ Y8cpl9aNevDjpgjel4JErd+i6vGN3hDKS99pPQ085t4wnsab12r5U9LMOXGMTJ+X LTbzjTZwf2h9xvWvfN7qt2QdDF/5mkpyTk48b3Fw+AraPXyxjPd0RB7xqVRZq9w= =Z1ke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
