]] Christoph Anton Mitterer > On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 21:07 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > That's handled by the initramfs where we currently don't use systemd. > > (It's supported upstream to do so and we might eventually investigate > > that, but I don't believe anybody has done any work on it for Debian.) > Sure... but > - using systemd inside the initramfs _may_ come at a later point
We'll tackle any bugs if we decide to do that. I don't see any point in trying to figure out any bugs we might run into if we go down a route nobody (in Debian, AFAIK) has even tried as an experiment. > - even though the root-fs (and the resume-fs) is mounted in the > initramfs image... it may still interfere with the boot process by > systemd, e.g. when the later might accidentally try to re-setup such > dm-crypt mappings or else... which were already set up in the initramfs. Why would it do that? Any such re-setup would be a bug, and I'm not aware of any bugs in that respect. Do you have any bugs where this actully happens today? > - all the questions, about whether systemd supports stacking of multiple > block layers is also interesting for non-root-filesystems. systemd mounts a block device. How that block device is up to multiple components such as lvm, cryptsetup, etc. It's correct that systemd currently does not support keyscripts, a deficency I was looking into just last week. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
