On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:54:32AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Moritz" == Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> writes:
>
> Moritz> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:03:51AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff
> wrote:
> >> Package: barnowl Version: 1.6.2-1.1 Severity: important Tags:
> >> patch
> >>
> >> Please enable hardened build flags for barnowl. dh does inject
> >> them automatically, when building in compat level 9:
> >>
> >> jmm@pisco:~$ hardening-check /usr/bin/barnowl /usr/bin/barnowl:
> >> (..) Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: yes (some
> >> protected functions found) Read-only relocations: yes
>
> Moritz> What's the status? Do you plan an upload in the next weeks
> Moritz> or shall I upload a NMU?
>
> The issue is that I'm not sure I like the patch. I'm not sure I'm
> comfortable depending on a new debhelper compatibility level for
> barnowl. It tends to get backported for a number of environments.
> You can NMU if you like, although I don't promise not to revert your
> patch.
> my recommendation is that you NMU what you proposed as I don't have a
> lot of time and krb5 (which I maintain) is needing attention and far
> more important than barnowl.
>
> If I revert I'll fix things another way (presumably adding an explicit
> call to dpkg-buildflags to an override in the debian/rules)
Can you reconsider, now that debhelper compat level is available in
stable?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
