#265745: pciutils: lspci uses wrong header type for PCI-X cap
# 2.2.0 is identical to what the patch proposes, thus
tags 265745 fixed-upstream
#292324: Patch to build pciutils on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
# 2.2.0 looks slightly different, but still similar enough, thus
tags 292324 fixed-upstream
#313100: pciutils-dev: fix some toshiba ids
# 2.2.0 includes a partial fix, still tagging as I don't know whether
# the submitter was right, thus
tags 313100 fixed-upstream
#302142: pciutils: man page typos: "unrealiable" & "Cambrige"
#337183: 'man lspci' typo: "unrealiable"
# 2.2.0 has fixed the typo in lspci.man and removed the paragraph in
# question from setpci.man. pcimodules.man still needs to be fixed as
# it came in via the diff.gz, thus still
tags 302142 fixed-upstream
#173274: pciutils: some info only available to root, say why
# 2.2.0's lspci.man contains a paragraph explaining that some
# information is not available to normal user. This should be enough
# to resolve this bug, thus
tags 173274 fixed-upstream
#256607: lspci: wrong memory size reported and other strange behavior
# 2.1.99-test8 contained a fix (as mentioned by upstream in this
# bugreport, thus
tags 256607 fixed-upstream
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd

#265771: pci.h missing u64 definition
# some definitions have been moved to types.h, including u64. Still
# not tagging this bug as I'm unsure whether this will suffice

All in all it seems that packaging 2.2.0 will resolve half of all
bugreports by itself, while some other bugs could be fixed
independently (#335665, #336331, #337079, #284110).
Please hit me with a cluebat if I misinterpreted a bug's status.

If time is too scarce a resource for you at the moment I can prepare
an update for you to check.

HTH,
Flo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to