Hi! On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 02:26:44 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > I quickly tried, and when the package is installed (dpkg -i) the > maintainer script is properly transitioned to "dpkg_script_t".
Ah, good. > dpkg-reconfigure is OTOH not transitioning the maintainer script to its > own context, I guess it also should be the case here? Right, a bug would need to be filed for debconf. You are probably in a better position to file it, and test possible implementations, would you mind? > Otherwise I think that the policy already has support for the > dpkg_script_t execution context, or did you had something specific in > mind? Yeah, but it seemed incomplete/partial or just with some workarounds to handle the missing dpkg_script_t support in dpkg. See for example the TODO item or the “Use named file transition to fix this” commend in «policy/modules/contrib/dpkg.te». Maybe there's other things that could be improved or refined now in the policy? I don't know. :) Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
