On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:53:04AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > Adrian, I'm frustrated when I read your message because you put words in > my mouth that I did not speak.
Hi Sam, > I never said that Debian should allow systemd to dictate policy for > multiple distributions nor did I say that Debian should allow one > upstream systemd maintainer to dictate decisions for Debian. I assume you are referring to That point you bring up is semi-orthogonal to the upgrade decision, but it also brings up two important points that have to be considered: The second line was not intended to imply that you said that, just very poorly worded by me. The second line might have been better worded like Possible problems I see when following this "we also need to be community players": > I spoke of community both in terms of a systemd community and in terms > of a community of Linux distributions. The problematic parts are where Debian differs from other distributions. E.g. Debian has been the only big Linux distribution that did support non-Linux kernels. If Debian wants to be closely aligned to the consensus among other distributions it might have to drop non-Linux kernels, and switching to systemd basically enforces that. > You may believe that some of these boil down to the same thing. I > request that you distinguish what you believe is a conclusion from > things I've said from the things I actually say. See above regarding my poor wording. > Thanks, > > --Sam cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org