On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.5.19 > Severity: normal > > If a package contains files with timestamps far in the future, then lintian > will emit different set of tags depending on whether it's run on 32- or > 64-bit machine. > > (i386) $ lintian --no-cfg libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev_0.3.4-1_amd64.deb > E: libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev: tar-errors-from-data Archive octal value > 33415462123 is out of time_t range; assuming two's complement > E: libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev: tar-errors-from-data Archive octal value > 33415462123 is out of time_t range; assuming two's complement > E: libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev: package-contains-ancient-file > usr/share/doc/libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev/changelog.gz 1950-12-22 > > (amd64) $ lintian --no-cfg libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev_0.3.4-1_amd64.deb > E: libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev: tar-errors-from-data > ./usr/share/doc/libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev/changelog.gz: time stamp > 2087-01-28 00:29:07 is 2307798691.20417264 s in the future > > > Apparently libghc-quickcheck-instances-dev would have been auto-rejected > from the archive if ftp-master.d.o had been running a 32-bit system.
What do you prefer ? Tag for 31bits overflow or 64 bits ? I suppose 31bits is on the safe side ? Bastien > > -- > Jakub Wilk > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
