Package: chocolate-doom Version: 1.7.0-3+b1 Severity: wishlist Hey Jon,
chocolate-doom 2.0.0 has just been released (i.e. git tag'ed [1]) today. Do you want to package this yourself or would you mind me joining in as a co- maintainer and preparing that package? Also, now that the chocolate-heretic, -hexen and -strife branches have been merged, do you think we should ship them all in the chocolate-doom package (my preference) or should these ports each get their own packages? - Fabian [1] https://github.com/fragglet/chocolate- doom/commit/e2f1ba09c6a801242d6641dd08784d721a749589 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages chocolate-doom depends on: ii doom-wad-shareware [doom-wad] 1.9.fixed-2 ii libc6 2.17-97 ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.12-9 ii libsdl-net1.2 1.2.8-3 ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15-8 chocolate-doom recommends no packages. chocolate-doom suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
