On Wednesday 04 December 2013 20:38:09 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 15:09:18 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > So I would like what the RT and arm* porters thinks. > > This is just my opinion, but if you decide to break ABI, I think you > should bump SONAME, and I think you must change package names.
Had it been part of a stable release or had it been used by more packages than what I can count on my fingers. Then maybe. Had it been on all architectures. Then maybe. Or hadn't it been a package where in general the abi is actually the same across several distributions, then maybe. But all in all, the fallout is minimal, and breaking compatibility with the rest of the world isn't worth it. So let's paper it over and not repeat it again in the future. /sune -- Genius, I cannot explore a tool from the control drawer menu inside Flash 3.2, how does it work? >From the file within Office you should never link with the FPU, in such way >then from the control options menu inside Outlook Express you must disable a Fast periferic of the memory for saving the controller to the secret code. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
