Hello, On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 01:11:27AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > Antonio, this is really weird: when we agreed that a "require > 'soap/soap'" was needed in order to use ruby-soap4r, I failed to > remember bug #567474 (shame on me!). > I hope you can figure out why this require seems to be harmful!
No idea. Looking at the ruby-soap4r source, the one file from ruby-soap4r that is loaded from apt-listbugs (`require 'soap/rpc/driver'`) already loads 'soap/soap', so it might be an issue with the ordering of the require statements, but I couldn't investigate further. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
