On Fri, Nov 15, 2013, at 8:19, Michael Prokop wrote: > I'd be willing to sponsor *this* upload
Thank you! And thank you for all of your feedback. The latest upload is available at mentors.debian.net: https://mentors.debian.net/package/iwatch After this upload, I will work to find another sponsor. In preparation for this upload, I reread the Debian Policy Manual chapters 1 through 7 to make sure I didn't miss anything obvious. > | Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution Revised to the "unstable" distribution. > Also why does the iwatch_0.2.2.orig.tar.gz file have a different > checksum than the one in the Debian pool? I made a mistake while repackaging the .orig.tar.gz tarball. I did not put the files under an iwatch-0.2.2/ subdirectory. Furthermore, there was no need for me to include the original source tarball in the upload to mentors.debian.net because, like you pointed out, it already exists in the Debian pool. This time, I chose NOT to include the orig tarball. > Please also document your changes (debian/compat, Build-Depends, > Vcs-* header, debian/source/format,...) in the changelog entry. I have added these details to my changelog entry. I also documented my minor changes to Depends and the maintainer scripts. One question for you: I assumed that you were the owner of git://git.grml.org/iwatch.git and would no longer be maintaining the sources there, so I chose to use Cahya Wirawan's upstream at https://svn.code.sf.net/p/iwatch/code/trunk/. Does this sound like a reasonable change? - Louis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
