On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 00:36 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> OK, I assumed it was gvfsd-gphoto2 as that's what #707681 was about.

Do you think this is unrelated and want me to open another bug report?
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to