Package: dgit Version: 0.17 Joey Hess writes ("Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)"): > My suggestion is to have dgit also push the dgit branch to the > remotes/dgit/master branch, as long as remotes/dgit/master is > an ancestor of the dgit branch, or does not yet exist. > > Some dgit users may want to have a master branch that is not connected > to the dgit history. They can simply make one forced push of the master > branch to prevent dgit from handling it. > > When multiple suites are involved, dgit currently does not connect > the history of the branches for those suites. So if a package is > first pushed to unstable (creating the master branch), and later to > experimental, the master branch would not be updated. This is probably > what we want to happen. OTOH, if a package is first released to > experimental (creating the master branch), later uploads to unstable > would not update the branch. This might be an unusual case that should > be handled with a forced push. Or, dgit could hardcode the name "sid" > along with the rest of its collection of per-distribution values > and only push master along with dgit/sid.
I think this is the right approach. Treating "sid" specially is the right answer I think. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org