Package: dgit
Version: 0.17

Joey Hess writes ("Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian 
branches)"):
> My suggestion is to have dgit also push the dgit branch to the
> remotes/dgit/master branch, as long as remotes/dgit/master is
> an ancestor of the dgit branch, or does not yet exist.
> 
> Some dgit users may want to have a master branch that is not connected
> to the dgit history. They can simply make one forced push of the master
> branch to prevent dgit from handling it.
> 
> When multiple suites are involved, dgit currently does not connect
> the history of the branches for those suites. So if a package is
> first pushed to unstable (creating the master branch), and later to
> experimental, the master branch would not be updated. This is probably
> what we want to happen. OTOH, if a package is first released to
> experimental (creating the master branch), later uploads to unstable
> would not update the branch. This might be an unusual case that should
> be handled with a forced push. Or, dgit could hardcode the name "sid"
> along with the rest of its collection of per-distribution values
> and only push master along with dgit/sid.

I think this is the right approach.  Treating "sid" specially is the
right answer I think.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to