Hello Alexander,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:04:37PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:24:12AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > IMHO, getty could be patched easily, maybe some option
> > may be added to suppress "tty-bitness-autodetection"
> > feature and this would be done by people with more
> > experience WRT linux console (and other kinds of ttys),
> > so I wouldn't perhaps want to extend/improve the
> > wrapper script further.
> 
> Yes, this sound great. By adding a switch, "legacy" systems could
> remain unaltered, while "modern" systems could get "sane" defaults,
> i.e., settings are not messed with.

I replaced one terminal of mine with:
9:23:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty9

and it at least fixes this bug. Do you know any reason to use getty
over mingetty on virtual consoles? (Serial lines are a different
issue, of course).

Greetings

            Helge

-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                       gpg signed mail preferred 
    64bit GNU powered                  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
          Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: pgpsB9GzwV27M.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to