It should be noted that the 1.4 is based on the 2.0 rewrite (yes, so 1.4
> 2.0 > 1.3), and has not seen new development for over a year.

When I tested those in 2012, I found that the 2.0/1.4 seemed problematic
/ unstable. While 1.3 also had its problems, the most critical of those
were patched by the author and included in the Debian uploads I did.

So unless the 1.4 branch picks up development again and becomes truly
stable, I'd suggest staying at 1.3.x and maybe adding some patches to it
/ upstream. Based on my experience I would consider 1.4 more an
experimental branch than a stable followup series to 1.3.

-Timo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to