Hi, Samuel Bronson <naes...@gmail.com> writes: > I've been working on GDB packaging, and upstream has been telling me > that if we built our libgcc and libc with the STAP probes enabled, it > would make some things work better; in particular:
Thanks for the detailed bug report! systemtap-sdt-dev used to be arch: all but that was changed to linux-any since it caused build failures on kfreebsd: "dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/systemtap-sdt-dev_1.6-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/include/sys/sdt.h', which is also in package kfreebsd-kernel-headers 0.62" -- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656383 (It was later switched from linux-any to i386 amd64 ia64 s390 powerpc arm armel armeb armhf since it cause build failures on mips, mipsel, s390x and sparc.) What do you propose? Should we try to rename one of the headers so that we don't have this conflict with kfreebsd-kernel-headers? -Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
