Fair enough. I have no San boot setup to test this. I am okay with the inclusion of the patch based on tests from u
s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Oct 14, 2013 9:10 PM, "Salvatore Bonaccorso" <car...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Ritesh > > Thanks for your reply! > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:50:15PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Hello Salvatore, > > > > > > Please check bug #618700. The udev rule changed with discussion on the > > upstream mailing list. > > Yes I have read this. AFAICS this is about the dmraid part. > > See my pu which includes that change. AFAICS the problem is that the > kpartx.udev rules additionally contained a workaround to read dm > information via /lib/udev/dmsetup_env (other distributions have a > patch having dmsetup export AFAIK). > > ----cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut----- > # This is a temporary hack until Debian's dmsetup properly supports > "dmsetup > # export". For more information see: #434241, #487881, #493078 > IMPORT{program}="dmsetup_env %M %m" > ----cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut----- > > So what I propose is to revert the changes to the pu mentioned > #726321, but keeping what was fixed for #618700. > > Hope that helps, > > Regards, > Salvatore >