Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
> I think you might have found it already ;).
Good.
> However, I am absolutely certain this bug is not wishlist. I reset it to
> normal, although I am tempted to say it is important.
I'm sorry, but that's not your call.
FYI, in my experience, reverting maintainers' decisions on a bug
severity, like you did, rarely has a joyful outcome. The right way to
do it, I believe, is to explain why you disagree first, instead of
reverting the decision you dislike.
> Using different keys for encrypting and signing is a completely
> supported feature, even included in ninjahelper and all,
I do agree that using 2 different keys with the same passphrase
is supported.
But using 2 different keys with different passphrases is not
supported, and has never been:
* the documentation tries to make it clear that only one (shared)
passphrase is supported when using 2 different keys;
* the code doesn't pretend to do otherwise.
So, both with my upstream and Debian maintainer hat, I consider this
to be a feature request, for something we have never even attempted to
support yet.
Thanks for your attention.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
