On 09-10-13 06:42, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this
> package.

For the record, it is neither. I fixed the issue that the debconf
templates were just never translatable.

> I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates
> review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf
> templates or modify the existing templates in a package or, if you
> prefer, to send a call for translations after uploading the first
> version that introduces new templates or templates changes.

Indeed. I should have thought of this. I will follow up after the
current review. The template has not seen any changes the last several
uploads thought, so there is not a whole lot of flux there.

> The debian-l10n-english team will now start a review, on our own
> initiative. It will be conducted through this bug report.

Great.

> If you want, you can ask for being CC'ed to the various discussions
> when the templates are reviewed.

I am subscribed to this bug, so I will contribute to the discussion.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to