Quoting Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > In fact, it turns out that the swat package embarks files which are > > also in samba-doc, namely the following directories: > > > This sounds like a packaging error which we should be able to correct > > quite quickly and easily. This is probably the reason why Peter > > tagged this bug as confirmed. > > Currently, the doc package is not required by swat, so in order for the > swat web interface to work without too many broken links, the > documentation needs to be included there. > > The idea, as I had already posted to the pkg-samba list, is to move the > pdf documentation to a separate package (in progress) and then make a > hard dependency from swat to the remaining doc package. The doc > package would then effectively represent the splitted out > architecture-independent data as requested by #233447.
Seems fair by me, yes. Given that we're many people digging around in the BTS for samab, using the "owner" tag of the BTS to make bugs as "being worked on by XXXXX" could be a good idea. That would mean here: owner 233447 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks sent to our friend [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
