Package: fuse Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: minor I am a translator and come across quite a few typical debconf questions. Therefore, I think I know when I see an unnecessary use of debconf.
I think fuse is one of these because, fuse imho should simply default to the fuse as group and that's it. Removing debconf means: - fewer translations - less overhead - fewer questions to a user (I know fuse's Qs are probably low prio) I would fuse very much compare to e.g. pmount, this uses simply the group "plugdev" as a non-changeable default, without asking any debconf question. I think fuse should behave the same way, and simply have a README, informing the user of group fuse. See /usr/share/doc/pmount/README.Debian for an example I do not see a reason what makes fuse so special compared to pmount, so it should use the same mechanism. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8jens01-ifplugd-b44 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
