Hi Sergei, On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:43:27PM +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Package: wavesurfer > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've renamed libsnack2 binary package to tcl-snack per Debian Tcl/Tk policy. > Please, do the same in the wavesurfer dependencies. I made tcl-snack provide > libsnack2, but it's better to use real package name.
I thought the plan was that we'd just depend on libsnack2 (or whatever) so that if you ever ended up adding tcl-snack-pulse (or whatever), then people could just choose whatever backend suited them best (which was the problem people originally had with -alsa). The rename of the snack packages doesn't bother me otherwise, but is there some reason that old plan really isn't the best plan anymore? Cheers, Ron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
