Hi Rigo, I am Debian developer, with a special interest in [Slidy].
Recently a [concern] was raised in Debian that the licensing terms of Slidy is not compatible with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Dave suggested that I ask you for advice. Essentially the problem is ambiguity in this sentence: > The slide show script and style sheet can be used freely under W3C's > [software licensing] and [document use] policies It can be interpret as those policies two being logically OR'ed (i.e. dual-licensing), or logically AND'ed (i.e. multiple required licenses). Question is therefore, if the correct interpretation of above is same as the following less ambiguate rephrasing: > The slide show script and style sheet can be used freely under either > W3C's [software licensing] or [document use] policies or instead the following less ambiguate rephrasing: > The slide show script and style sheet can be used freely under the > combination of both W3C's [software licensing] or [document use] > policies Kind regards, - Jonas [Slidy]: http://www.w3.org/Talks/Tools/Slidy2/ [concern]: http://bugs.debian.org/722134 [software licensing]: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software [document use]: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
