On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:02:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Thomé wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Bill Allombert > <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: > > I like to clarify that I see this is purely as a Debian issue. > > You must be kidding. It's a pari issue (and, incidentally, gap too) > because of pari's well known bogus requirement on > sizeof(void*)==sizeof(long). Any ABI which has this is a no-go for > pari. x32 is one of them.
No, it is not: on x32, sizeof(void*)==sizeof(long)==4. It could be possible to change PARI to work with sizeof(long)==4 and sizeof(void*)==8 but this would not address this issue in any way. > On the other hand, I understand that gmp does fine on the x32 ABI (see > messages in January this year on gmp-devel), so the present discussion So does PARI using the native kernel, or PARI with GMP built with sizeof(mp_limb_t)=4. > is going off-topic as far as gmp is concerned. At least we agree it is not a GMP issue. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
