On 30/09/2013 00:42, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> (2013-06-10): >> --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 15:54:09.000000000 >> +0100 >> +++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-06-10 01:01:48.000000000 >> +0200 >> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ >> +redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-2+deb7u1) proposed-updates; urgency=low > > Even though that would work, I'd be happy to see "wheezy" in there, > which can be useful after a while to figure out which suite was targeted > at that point (without having to look at the version number, and its > meaning).
Do you mean it'd be better to use "wheezy-proposed-updates" as distribution ? >> + [ Ondřej Surý ] >> + * Pull upstream fixes for Ruby 1.9 as default interpreter: >> + + Use DateTime.parse as alternative to ParseDate.parsedate, >> + fixing time series and schedule SVG graphs. (Closes: #700754) >> + + Use ::Time from global namespace, fixing REST Issue API. >> + (Closes: #700009) > > Assuming the latter change doesn't break the Ruby 1.8 use case (and > doesn't need a dance similar to the respond_to one in the former), > please upload (with or without an edit for the above mentioned point). I'm going to recheck that because i only remember doing it on irb, not on redmine code. Thanks for looking into this. Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
