Control: tag -1 moreinfo

Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (2013-06-03):
> On 2013-05-22 01:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I'm not sure about the practical impact, besides “it's not nice to
> > have undeterministic behaviours”. AFAICT, the extra .so doesn't hurt
> > when it's here (you wouldn't suggest shipping it in the package
> > otherwise, right?), and nobody has ever complained about its being
> > missing AFAICT from your bug report.
> 
> the src:json-c packages in unstable have a similar problem and people
> are getting spurious "libjson0: error while loading shared libraries:
> libjson.so.0" errors (#709512), maybe that could be attributed to this
> ldconfig issue: leaving around a dangling SONAME symlink for an
> indefinite time

That's not really an answer to the question about practical impacts.

> > So I guess I'll prefer sticking to the current status quo…

Accordingly, that's still true.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to