Control: tag -1 patch Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2013-04-28): > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 04/27/2013 04:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner. > > > Unfortunately it's now too late to get these fixes in to r0, but I do > > > think we should consider whether some of them are appropriate for a > > > stable update at a later point. > > > > Sounds like a great idea. > > > > So, I should push that to wheezy-proposed-updates after the release? I > > haven't done any stable updates before, that's why I'm asking :). > > I think it's worth a review after the release of the requests we've > postponed, before we ack them. I'll aim to do that in the couple of > weeks after the release (after a couple of days recuperation), but feel > free to ping us if you don't hear anything.
I've just had a look. I think it looks mostly good to me, I'm just not an expert for the following parts: - PIPESTATUS, - bash completion, so a second pair of eyes would be appreciated for those. It doesn't look like many bugs were reported lately, so I guess we could indeed consider dlocate for wheezy-proposed-updates; since that would be a rebuild of 1.02+nmu3 for wheezy, we would probably welcome a changelog entry on top of the current source package, using the following version: 1.02+nmu3~deb7u1. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
