Faré wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.net> wrote: >> Faré wrote: >>> Robert: when do you [intend] to release 3.0.3 ? Otherwise, I could do a >>> Debian >>> package for 3.0.2.9. (PS: I took the liberty of also committing my >>> load-systems* patch). >> I was waiting on those two more UIOP patches (see the launchpad tracker >> -- sorry I'm on a plane so I can't look them up myself), but I agree >> that this needs a new version. >> > Which UIOP patches were you thinking of? I fixed a simple one > regarding ensure-function. I see other portability issues with > directory* and symlinks, but I am not competent to address them.
I'm thinking of 1205555 https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1205555 and 1205653 https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/1205653 I was hoping to get some work done on these, but that target is slipping. > >> I'll be OOT till Friday, but will try to run the full set of tests (they >> run on my laptop on all officially supported platforms), and if they >> pass, we can release 3.0.3 then. >> > Excellent. > >> I am afraid I still don't have the ability to test on linux, or to build >> the Debian package -- still without a linux platform on which to hack ASDF. >> > I can do that part, at least for the free software and proprietary > implementations for which I still have a license. I just tested on an old and crufty linux box. Worked for ccl sbcl cmucl allegro allegromodern. ECL fails the test on my box. Goes into an infinite loop compiling test/file3.lisp -- gets an error in compilation, retries, gets an error .... This may be the fact that I'm trying this on an ancient OpenSUSE box, with a distro version that's been EOLed, so that may be me, not ASDF. If you could test with ECL, and it works for you, I am going to chalk this up to my ancient distro. > >> I am still having mysterious problems with bundling on my tests on ABCL >> and ECL, but I am pretty sure that the errors on ECL have to do with its >> own incorrect detection of 32- vs. 64-bit. ABCL is a bit more >> mysterious to me. Haven't been able to get any help with either of >> these, so don't think they should be allowed to block progress on other >> implementations. >> > In case it means anything, tests pass on both ECL and ABCL on Linux x64. As I said, I think ECL, as packaged by Mac Ports is busted on Mac, and I can't fix it. I don't have a good way to tell if ABCL is busted on Mac or our bundle op is busted on Mac. Best, r -- Robert P. Goldman Principal Scientist Smart Information Flow Technologies (d/b/a SIFT, LLC) 211 N. First St., Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Voice: (612) 326-3934 Email: rpgold...@sift.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
