Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

The reason:
with 0.2.0 some functions were dropped from public API completely.
See
https://github.com/yarikoptic/libfreenect/commit/de7802a38cbbca9817ddbee0d06658a7a5f5e4ca
for changes in .symbols file

There are only 2 reverse dependencies:

psychtoolbox-3
 unstable: 3.0.9+svn2579.dfsg1 -- FTBFS due to gcc 4.8 incompatibilities
           
 experimental: 3.0.10.20130108.dfsg1-1
               
 And I will upload shortly 3.0.11.20130711.dfsg1-1 to experimental which
 resolved 4.8 incompatibilities

 otherwise -- libfreenect should not impact building of this package (tested
 locally).  But for transition to happen it seems to depend on both gcc
 4.8 transition and glew...

 if 4.8 gcc gets into jessie before glew 1.9, ptb-3 would need to be removed
 from jessie anyways.

visp
 binNMU should be sufficient

Please let me know if you see any obstacle here and/or should I go ahead and
upload 0.2.0 package to unstable.

Ben file:

title = "libfreenect";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libfreenect0.1" | .depends ~ "libfreenect0.2";
is_good = .depends ~ "libfreenect0.2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libfreenect0.1";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to