Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> writes: > Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> writes:
>> Package: openafs-client,tar-scripts >> Version: openafs-client/1.6.5-1 >> Version: tar-scripts/1.26+dfsg-10 >> Severity: serious >> User: trei...@debian.org >> Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > I'll fix this by having tar-scripts conflict with openafs-client. I should probably rename backup to afs-backup. It's a horrible name for a program; the only excuse is that it was 1985 and people didn't know better. But the native AFS backup software isn't widely used any more. The only drawback is that it's a whole command suite with a lot of subcommands with their own documentation, so a lot of docs will be wrong. I'll check with upstream about this. A conflict with openafs-client isn't really desireable, since that's a pretty widely installed package at sites that use AFS. Failing renaming, I'm inclined to split all the backup software off into a separate package that you can conflict with, since most people aren't using it. (That would be backup, butc, and fms.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
