On Sunday 30 October 2005 11:14, Sven Luther wrote: --cut-- > > > # The arch-dependent packages are only available on archs supported by > > > ocamlopt There are no native code compilers on arch m68k so this > > > package arch-dependant part should not build on it. dpkg-genchanges -B > > > -mDebian/m68k Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg-genchanges: > > > arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages > > > dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or > > > directory > > > > Well, we end up needing dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-buildpackage with > > support for building only architecture-independant parts of the package > > and not architecture-dependent ones (see #109794 #200454). > > There is already infrastructure for binary-arch and binary-indep available, > as well as two set of build-deps, the normal ones and the indep ones.
Well that infrastructure is not done by dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-buildpackage (unless I missed to see how) but it was tried to be done as good as possible by our rules targets. Is there a way to build just the binary-indep targets and deb packages on certain architectures so that the build process can exit gracefully ? What we need is from a single source package to produce native and native + indep packages depending on the architecture that source package being built. > > > If this package is not supposed to be built on m68k, please say so in > > > your control file and/or stop the build right at the beginning. > > Christian, this is a fuckup of the buildd's i think, which try to build > stuff even if not marked for them. Not sure i haven't locked at this > recently. If that is the case it should be tracked down. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
