Control: reopen -1

I am going to try this.

Bastien
Le 19 sept. 2013 16:15, "Debian Bug Tracking System" <ow...@bugs.debian.org>
a écrit :

> Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:10:45 +0200
> with message-id <523b05e5.6090...@thykier.net>
> and subject line Re: Bug#602304: lintian: Please check debian/patches for
> DEP 3 syntax
> has caused the Debian Bug report #602304,
> regarding lintian: Please check debian/patches for DEP 3 syntax
> to be marked as done.
>
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
> Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
>
> (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
> message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
> misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
> immediately.)
>
>
> --
> 602304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602304
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:16:43 +0200
> Subject: lintian: Please check debian/patches for DEP 3 syntax
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.4.3
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> PLease add checks that would study the files uder debian/patches/ and
> their compliance with DEP 3[1].
>
> At this time, at least a checks for proper mandatory fields:
>
>    Description or Subject (required)
>
> Possibly also, at this time:
>
>     Author or From (optional)
>
> [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages lintian depends on:
> ii  binutils               2.20.1-15         The GNU assembler, linker and
> bina
> ii  diffstat               1.53-1            produces graph of changes
> introduc
> ii  dpkg-dev               1.15.8.5          Debian package development
> tools
> ii  file                   5.04-5            Determines file type using
> "magic"
> ii  gettext                0.18.1.1-3        GNU Internationalization
> utilities
> ii  intltool-debian        0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant
> conf
> ii  libapt-pkg-perl        0.1.24+b1         Perl interface to libapt-pkg
> ii  libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1            Perl module that
> automatically gen
> ii  libipc-run-perl        0.89-1            Perl module for running
> processes
> ii  libparse-debianchangel 1.1.1-2.1         parse Debian changelogs and
> output
> ii  libtimedate-perl       1.2000-1          collection of modules to
> manipulat
> ii  liburi-perl            1.54-2            module to manipulate and
> access UR
> ii  locales                2.11.2-6          Embedded GNU C Library:
> National L
> ii  man-db                 2.5.7-4           on-line manual pager
> ii  perl [libdigest-sha-pe 5.10.1-15         Larry Wall's Practical
> Extraction
>
> lintian recommends no packages.
>
> Versions of packages lintian suggests:
> pn  binutils-multiarch            <none>     (no description available)
> ii  libtext-template-perl         1.45-1     Text::Template perl module
> ii  man-db                        2.5.7-4    on-line manual pager
>
> -- debconf-show failed
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>
> To: 602304-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc: Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net>
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:10:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: Bug#602304: lintian: Please check debian/patches for DEP 3
> syntax
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
>
> On 2012-01-19 00:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Personally, with the limited time I am currently putting into Lintian, I
> > would prefer to spend it on important issues or trivial/well-defined
> > issues.  You are more than welcome to write a (set of) patch(es) for it,
> > but if this is left to me I will probably end up tagging it wontfix.
> >
> > ~Niels
> >
> > [...]
> >
>
> AFAICT there has been no changes here, so I guess this is "left to me".
>  So as promised, I will tag it wontfix.  At the same time I am taking
> the liberty of closing it so it does not clutter the Lintian bug page.
>
> ~Niels
>

Reply via email to